Study for the ITIL 4 Foundation Exam with comprehensive multiple choice questions and flashcards. Each question offers hints and explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the definition of technical debt in ITIL?

  1. The time taken to implement a workaround.

  2. The total rework backlog accumulated by choosing workarounds instead of system solutions.

  3. The quality of work completed within a specific timeframe.

  4. Debt incurred from using outdated technology.

The correct answer is: The total rework backlog accumulated by choosing workarounds instead of system solutions.

The definition of technical debt in ITIL pertains to the total rework backlog that accumulates when teams opt for quick and often temporary solutions, known as workarounds, instead of investing the necessary time and effort to create robust, long-term system solutions. This choice typically arises from a desire to deliver immediate results, which can lead to a situation where future improvements are increasingly complicated, time-consuming, and costly. By understanding technical debt in this way, organizations can better recognize the impact of their short-term decisions on long-term sustainability, enabling them to balance urgent needs with the importance of maintaining a healthy, manageable technology environment. While the other options touch on various aspects related to technology and work processes, they do not encapsulate the essence of technical debt as effectively as the total rework backlog due to choosing workarounds. Option A focuses on the timeframe for implementing an immediate fix, which doesn’t capture the broader implications for system maintenance. Option C concerns the quality of work within a timeframe, which is relevant to performance but not specifically to the concept of technical debt. Option D mentions outdated technology but does not address the broader context of decisions made in favor of expedience over long-term value and maintainability.